Strangely, those who still believe that the Earth is flat, especially when they demand to prove it, despite the availability of all the scientific evidence confirming the spherical earth.
Strangely enough, they do not have the opportunity to seize it, to abandon a whole subject to the argument that the land is flat, and others find themselves in a futile dialogue and sophistication of his first and no other.
In the end, they will not be convinced of any evidence or scientific argument proving the spherical earth, because they will not fall into it in the vacuum when they are at the bottom of the Earth (Antarctica).
In any case, that's okay. Perhaps basketball can convince them of the earth's corollary. Or at least that's what software engineer Jeff thinks.
Jeff has proved that they believe the earth's corpuscles are completely wrong, and proved it in the most intelligent and simple way.
Jeff used a very simple scientific experiment to see whether the Earth was truly spherical, as claimed by the theory.
His scientific experience included some calculations and using a basketball and a camera with mini lenses only, according to the newspaper "Independent" British.
The idea of the basket is similar in shape to the ground, but on a much smaller scale, and here comes the role of miniature lenses.
"From the perspective of the images I've taken, it's easy to imagine being a very small creature living on the surface of a basketball," says Jeff, 36. "From a small creature's perspective, the horizon on basketball is flat."
Using the horizon as a basic guide, the tiny creature will necessarily assume that the basketball is flat and not spherical. "
However, Jeff says he does not expect those who believe in flat-earth theory to change their minds, but he hopes his idea will help those skeptical.
Jeff says he has resorted to this idea because the refuseniks of the earth use it in their rejectionist logic.
Geoff stressed that the images he took did not prove the earth's spherical science, but they only illustrate the matter, noting that the images prove in a simple way that the surface of the spherical body can appear flat, and that the flat horizon of objects is not enough for our attachment that these objects are not spherical or flat.
Finally, what do you think, the owners of the theory of flat land? It's ridiculous, is not it?
